Skip to contentKey point
- This case shows that the ECJ takes a perfunctory approach to ensuring compliance with the principle of conferral by taking the legislature’s word at face value
Facts
- Directive 2002/46 harmonises national rules governing foods containing concentrated sources of nutrients on the basis of legislative diversity harming the internal market
Held (Court of Justice)
Judgment
- The court referred to the Directive’s Recitals and the observations of the Parliament and the Council in finding that the claim to disruptive legislative diversity was made good
- It also referred to “a substantial number of complaints from economic operators” made to the Commission about such variation though it does not appear to have looked at any of these.
- And, without more, reliance on Article 95 EC, now Article 114 TFEU, is accepted.
Feedback?
Constitutional limits cases