Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330

Key Point

  • This case laid down the Rylands v Fletcher rule which states that where:
    1. a person who accumulates a substance on their land that is likely to do mischief if it escapes,
    2. the accumulation being a non-natural use of the land,
    3. and it does escape,
    4. they are liable for damage resulting from the escape.

Facts

  • Ds employed independent contractors to build a dam on their land.
  • The dam was constructed over gives disused mine shafts, which unknown to them, led into C’s mines.
  • The reservoir burst into the shafts and flowed into C’s mines.
  • C sued D in respect of the damage the flooding caused.
  • The case was first heard in the Court of the Exchequer Chamber ((1866) LR 1 Exch 265) before being affirmed on appeal by the House of Lords.

Membership Required

Sign up to read the rest and gain access to the following features:

2000+ members-only CasesArticle SummariesNotesLegislation AnalysesModel AnswersFlashcardsSQE MCQsLLB MCQsAI ChatDark ModeShop discount
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here