Geys v Société Générale [2012] UKSC 63

Oxford First-Class Contract Law Notes


View

Premium
Notes

PQ
Guide

Model
Answers

Key Point

  • A repudiatory breach of a contract of employment did not terminate the contract unless the other party elected to accept the repudiation

Facts

  • Geys (C) was employed by the bank Société Générale (D)
  • Under the terms of the employment contract, D could terminate the contract either by providing C with three months written notice, or terminate immediately by making a payment in lieu of notice
  • D summarily dismissed C on 29 November 2007 but did not give C payment in lieu of notice until 18 December 2007, and only informed C of the payment in lieu on 4 January 2008
  • It was in C’s favour to claim that the contract was terminated in 2008 rather than 2007, as it would entitle him to a higher severance payment: [6]
  • C brought proceedings for:
    • severance payment due to him under the contract based on a termination date of 6 January 2008, when C is deemed to have received D’s notice of the payment in lieu of notice under the contract; and
    • damages for breach of contract

Issue

  • The main doctrinal argument was whether the automatic theory or elective theory of termination is correct
  • The automatic theory states that a contract is terminated automatically upon a repudiatory breach, this favours D as the contract would have been terminated on 29 November 2007
  • The elective theory states that a contract is terminated only when the innocent party elects to the terminate the contract after a repudiatory breach by the defaulting party

Membership Required

Sign up to read the rest and gain access to the following features:

2000+ members-only CasesArticle SummariesNotesLegislation AnalysesModel AnswersFlashcardsSQE MCQsLLB MCQsAI ChatDark ModeShop discount
Join Now

Already a member? Log in here