Key Points
- Termination is prospective - it wipes away future obligations under the contract but does not render the contract void ab initio
- Obtaining an order for specific performance does not forfeit the right to terminate and sue for breach
- Damages in contract law aim to put the innocent party, so far as money can do so, in the same position as if the contract had been performed
- The date of assessment is not necessarily fixed at the date of breach; the court can vary it when another date better reflects the claimant’s losses
Facts
- The Johnsons (C) contracted to sell their farm to Mrs Agnew (D), but she refused to complete
- C obtained an order for specific performance against D but it was never carried out
- The mortgagees sold the farm but realised an insufficient amount to discharge C’s debt
- C sued D for breach of contract
- D argued that C had lost its right to sue for breach when it elected to seek specific performance
