Key Point
- Consent to assault is vitiated where there is fraud as to the nature or quality of the act
Facts
- Women (Vs) allowed D to examine their breasts on the basis of his false representation that he was medically qualified and conducting a survey into breast cancer
- D was convicted of assault but appealed on the basis that Vs had consented
Held (Court of Appeal)
- Appeal dismissed – the defence of consent did not apply
Rose LJ
- The women were ‘consenting to touching for medical purposes, and not to indecent behaviour, that is, there was consent to the nature of the act, but not its quality’: p. 337
Get tutored by top graduates from Oxbridge
Sign Up